Enhanced bot using memory reads - Printable Version +- The Bytecode Club - Reverse Engineering Forum (https://the.bytecode.club) +-- Forum: Lobby (https://the.bytecode.club/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Game Cheating, Botting & Reverse Engineering (https://the.bytecode.club/forumdisplay.php?fid=97) +--- Thread: Enhanced bot using memory reads (/showthread.php?tid=348) |
RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - Envyus - 01-17-2015 Greyman add me on Skype RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - Greyman - 01-17-2015 (01-17-2015, 12:32 AM)barracoda Wrote: Is this from an enemy base? o_O (01-17-2015, 09:42 PM)Envyus Wrote: Greyman add me on Skype Hi Envy, I'd like to, but unfortunately I'm unable to use Skype - at home I have the kids running around constantly (now THERE'S a massive time sink ), and at work the corporate firewall gets in the way. Any other suggestions? Grey. RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - Envyus - 01-17-2015 We only use the message feature of Skype and have an on going developers group conversation. That is the only way we currently don't use any other methods to communicate. RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - Greyman - 01-17-2015 (01-17-2015, 09:01 PM)madalilng Wrote: here's my computation to calculate miners/pumps this should work. Hi Madalilng, I've seen code very similar to this in a VMT entry, about 5 or 6 pointer references deep from the elixir collector base struct. It was one of about half a dozen routines I'd bookmarked for further analysis Many thanks for the heads up, I'll definitely be trying this out. I'm pretty sure I've seen something similar to res_time relatively close to the VMT entry in question, which makes it the top candidate for analysis when I circle back to collectors. Interestingly, the res_time when the collector is boosted (if what I've found is equivalent) seems to go constantly backwards, while the in-memory reference to the resource per hour stays the same. It looked like SuperCell dodgy the boost by modifying the time basepoint, rather than boosting the collection rate. Have you noticed anything similar? Bizarre if true, but the same result in the end I guess. RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - Greyman - 01-17-2015 Some basic info to help get people going, who might also be interested in going down this path. Some of the building types are missing - particularly TH9+, as I don't have anyone in my clan above TH8 (lame I know!). I've only started building up these types in the last few days, so it's on my to-do list to circle back and find a couple of TH9's/TH10's while raiding, to fill in the gaps. public enum ClashBuildingType { ArmyCamp = 1000000, TownHall = 1000001, ElixirCollector = 1000002, ElixirStorage = 1000003, GoldCollector = 1000004, GoldStorage = 1000005, Barracks = 1000006, Laboratory = 1000007, Cannon = 1000008, ArcherTower = 1000009, Wall = 1000010, WizardTower = 1000011, AirDefense = 1000012, Mortar = 1000013, ClanCastle = 1000014, BuilderHut = 1000015, HiddenTesla = 1000019, SpellFactory = 1000020, BarbarianKing = 1000022, DarkElixirDrill = 1000023, DarkElixirStorage = 1000024, DarkBarracks = 1000026 } public enum ClashTroopType { Barbarian = 4000000, Archer = 4000001, Goblin = 4000002, Giant = 4000003, Wallbreaker = 4000004, Balloon = 4000005, Wizard = 4000006, Healer = 4000007, Dragon = 4000008, Pekka = 4000009 } RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - madalilng - 01-17-2015 1000021 = xbow. 1000027 = inferno tower. RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - madalilng - 01-17-2015 minion = 4000010 hogs = 4000011 valkyrie = 4000012 Golem= 4000013 Warlock= 4000015 RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - Greyman - 01-17-2015 public enum ClashTrapType { Bomb = 12000000, SpringTrap = 12000001, GiantBomb = 12000002, AirMine = 12000005, SeekingAirMine = 12000006, SkeletonTrap = 12000008 } RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - 5pArxz - 01-17-2015 RE: Enhanced bot using memory reads - 5pArxz - 01-18-2015 |