Posts: 131
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2014
for the user have 64bit system and want to use this bot u need to compile to 32bit (x86) or run it into autoit 32bit if you have error dead base attack try look the script using scite.exe and look the autoit3wrapper_usex64=n if u change to y the error deadbase attack will show up...need to change to =n thanks...
Posts: 131
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 31
Threads: 3
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
oh sorry i can't see the ''Meet TH outside'' option... (but i checked attack TH outside)
Posts: 13
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
Where in the script can i modify to close barrack window after training?
Posts: 66
Threads: 6
Joined: Jan 2015
02-01-2015, 01:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-01-2015, 01:58 AM by General Sam.)
I thought everything was okay but the bot keeps attacking storage bases...not dead bases. I think this bot is optimized for x86...even if I run compile it in x86 mode.
Posts: 53
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
12
02-01-2015, 02:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-01-2015, 02:19 AM by DrImmo.)
Hey guys,
first let me thank u as well for your awesome work!
I realy love this bot and its great to see so many people working so harD to make it even better.
But i am running in some problems using this mod (latest version)
I have a win7 64 bit os an running the bot in 32bit from script or compiled (tried both)
But i dont get the bot to work properly.
He does not attack with barbs... no matter what kind of troops i configure... i want to attack using barch, but he just uses all archers and then nothing more...
He also is always attacking undead bases with no success of course
Here are my configs:
Troop settings:
use barracks, b1: barbs, b2-4: archers
Donate settings:
Nothing to donate/request
attack settings:
Dead bases, king atk dead bases, no cc troops, attack on all sides, use barracks, atk th unticked, atk th with lightning spell unticked
search settings:
meet gold and elex, min gold 100k, min elex 0, Max th lvl 10
Any ideas what i am doing wrong?