> Lambdas really aren't a big change tbh, and it's not a change at all when it comes to functionality. The only difference is syntax and afaik (haven't read any info on JVM 1.8 ) it compiles down to almost the same thing. They actually compile down to something significantly diff
> whats the performance for this method, it would be slower i assume? > also is there a paper or something on this concept It would certainly be slower, yes. That's often a price obfuscators are prepared to pay. I can't remember off the top of my head where I first saw this descr
> **soulija boy wrote:** > > > **Bibl wrote:** > > > > > **lab27 wrote:** > > > > > > classic illegal java rewrites (like replacing a loop with a self-vectoring exception table). > > > > > > > > what u mean > > > > what u mean This. Take a loop, remove the back jump, replace it w
> does this deobfuscate too? Depends what you mean - it has multiple normalisation passes to deal with lots of interesting potential obfuscations, it doesn't trust most of the metadata attributes (signature table, variable name table etc.). The normalisation passes quite often ha
