Deadbase Search

@Antidote
That code you posted is already updated.

@bushido-21
Yes any versions of 5.3 and even 5.4 will work.

@Cocsi
Yes, higher tolerance means higher chance of getting a hit as well as false positives.

@Kaz
Nice! Did you use v5.4?

@Everyone
I forgot to mention that I included Lv12 collectors having the 1/3 fill (e12f7). It is actually messing the matching of collectors Lv10 and 11 both for SET B and C. You may manually disable those simply by putting any string beside the filepath in the code.
ex:

$E[0][8] = @ScriptDir&"\images\ELIX1\E12F7.bmpx"; <-----"x"

I forgot about that collector when I kept on attacking 1/3 fill ones thus I decreased tolerance to around 50. I got shocked when I skipped a 700K each resource deadbase! Careful with tolerance.. It popped to my head that I need to replace Lv12 collectors but then again I thought of the Lv12 1/3 fill messing around Lv10&11 that made me drop tolerance and thus made me skip the loot of a lifetime for th9.

@AtoZ
I decided to let it run with Set B last night with tolerance 65. So pretty good matches with zombies but it still has the hang bug. Still unsure if it has to do with the imagesearch or something else. But I think I am getting somewhere with it. I'll report when I go home today and see the results.

I am using 5.3.4 (Antitode's release) with my changes that I haven't released yet until I iron'ed out the bugs. I haven't used 5.4 because I want to isolate the white/hang issue before adding more complexity.

5.3.5 still skipping perfect deadbases.
From skippedzombies folder:

@missileplatypus

5.3.5 is who's version again? Was it using the old version or Set A,B, or C and on what Tolerance? I tried SetB and my findings are similar with Kaz.

I think it is time to implement individual tolerance. For example if it skipped a type of collector, one could simply adjust per type. That way it'll be more accurate. It'll be simple to code too. Also, it will open door to different sizes and CUTS of images as well so 1/3 fill lv12 collector may not complicate Lv10-11.. I need to test every images to different tolerance which is very time consuming lol.

Think these people should learn how to ask question. They want you to solve their problems but don't bother to give u more detail. Think developer should ignore these people.

@missileplatypus

5.3.5 is who's version again? Was it using the old version or Set A,B, or C and on what Tolerance? I tried SetB and my findings are similar with Kaz.

I think it is time to implement individual tolerance. For example if it skipped a type of collector, one could simply adjust per type. That way it'll be more accurate. It'll be simple to code too. Also, it will open door to different sizes and CUTS of images as well so 1/3 fill lv12 collector may not complicate Lv10-11.. I need to test every images to different tolerance which is very time consuming lol.

5.3.5 is my release with SetB using Tolerance 65. But I totally agree with you that people should adjust and see what works best for them which is why the tolerance value is adjustable in 5.3.5. I've seen some skipped dead bases and it's not perfect but it gets the job done and I am really satisfied with the results.

If people want something perfect, they should:

• get one of the paid bots
• tweak their own values and/or help improve it

The advance deadbase search is also super promising but it won't be applicable to everyone, unfortunately.

Human nature to be greedy... Given to them free and able to customise to their own needs, but the plain lazy and want you to feed them attitude ... Many times there are already posts somewhere for them to read, yet didn't bother... Just try their luck, shoot the question and hope someone will give them the answer they want.
And when they ask, they asked in a blaming tone and demand an answer as soon as possible... Not even a please... Taking things for granted...

Think these people should learn how to ask question.  They want you to solve their problems but don't bother to give u more detail.  Think developer should ignore these people.

Fuck my bad. Thought you implemented that folder just so we could post here what bases it skipped that it shouldn't have. Won't try to help again 😕

Maybe you are trying to help but by just telling us that the bot makes u lose 2 perfect loot and posting 2 pic without telling us in detail of your setting isn't helping..

The folder is meant for the user to see how to modify the setting to make the bot more smarter in picking up dead base not for posting up to tell developer... See see... Your bot makes me lose 2 perfect bases... For info, at the stage, everything is trial and error.

Like kaz said, if you think this bot is not good for you, you can choose to wait for it to stablise or use other bot.

The forum is open for everyone to read... There are already guide on using the dead base function... Please do some reading....

Anyway, thank you for trying to help and I do encourage everyone to do your contributions to make this a better bot.

idk if u put this to the code but it will be good if the bot can detect inactive bases using the image rank icon
the bot only detects collectors that are full even if storage still have resources